› Measure and remoteness of damages in actions for breach of contract
› General
› Significant damage to potato grading line in fire
› Grading line rectified
› Grading line as rectified not as accurate as line pre-fire - Assessment of damages
› Reasonableness of plaintiffs' claim for costs of replacing equipment as valued where actual replacement costs known.
Robinson v Harmon [1848] EngR 135; (1848) 1 Ex 850; Bellgrove v Eldridge [1954] HCA 36; (1954) 90 CLR 613; Gagner Pty Ltd trading as Indochine Café v Canturi Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 413; Central Coast Leagues Club Ltd v Gosford City Council, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 9 June 1998, unreported; Hyder Consulting (Aust) Pty Ltd v Wilh Wilhelmsen Agency Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 313; Marlow v Walsh (2008) 18 Tas R 153, referred to.
Damages
› Measure and remoteness of damages in actions for breach of contract
› General - Significant damage to potato grading line in fire
› Grading line rectified
› Was grading line a fixture?
Agripower Barraba Pty Limited v Blomfield [2013] NSWSC 1598; Australian Provincial Assurance v Coroneo [1938] NSWStRp 35; (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 700, referred to.
Case Details
Citation[2014] TASSC 55
CourtTASSC
JurisdictionTasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.
