› subpoena served on a medical clinic and Corrections Victoria to obtain access to the plaintiff’s medical records
› whether privileged pursuant to s28(2) of the Evidence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1958
› whether there had been implied waiver of such privilege.
Rule 42A subpoena
› subpoena served on the Chief Commissioner of Police by the second, third, fourth and fifth defendants to obtain access to the plaintiff’s criminal records
› whether relevant
› forensic purpose to admit evidence of tendency pursuant to s97 of the Evidence Act 2008.
Answers to Interrogatories
› serial defects in the drafting of interrogatories delivered by the second, third, fourth and fifth defendants for the examination of the plaintiff.
Answers to Interrogatories
› adequacy of answers made by the litigation Guardian for the fifth defendant
› whether there had been compliance with r30.08 of the County Court Rules of Civil Procedure 2008.
Case Details
Citation[2014] VCC 922
CourtVCC
JurisdictionVictoria
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
