The case is a routine application of established principles governing leave to appeal from criminal convictions in Western Australia. It confirms that the test for unreasonable verdict requires the appellate court to consider whether it was open to the trier of fact to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt, giving due weight to the trial court's advantage in seeing and hearing witnesses. It also confirms that a [name withheld] warning is not required for non-sexual offences.
The full text is available to signed-in members.