› whether worker’s employment is connected with the Australian Capital Territory or New South Wales - whether a single Territory or State can be identified as where the worker is usually based for the purpose of their employment
› no single Territory or State can be identified as place where the worker was usually based for the purpose of his employment.
Appeal
› Appeals From and Control Over Magistrates
› appeal from the Industrial Court
› whether Magistrate made an error in finding that the worker was usually based on New South Wales for the purpose of their employment
› appeal upheld
› matter remitted to the Industrial Court for further determination.
Case Details
Citation[2015] ACTSC 1
CourtACTSC
JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
Decision Date5 February 2015
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
