› young offender to be sentenced for aggravated burglaries, thefts and dishonest use of motor vehicles
› application for reparation order in respect of damage to vehicle
› no basis for inferring that loss suffered by owner or insurance company arose out of offender’s dishonest use of vehicle concerned so as to satisfy criteria for making of order
› reparation order refused.
Case Details
Citation[2015] ACTSC 401
CourtACTSC
JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
Decision Date2 November 2015
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
