The decision to discharge a stay of an order for possession involves a discretionary judgment of what is appropriate and in the interests of justice in all the circumstances. A party's concern that the terms of an existing inquiry as to damages may not cover a period after the stay is discharged is not a sufficient reason for refusing to discharge the stay, as the party can enforce the judgment for possession and pursue any additional damages claim in the usual manner.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.