A consciousness of guilt (Edwards) direction should not be given where proof that the accused's account is a lie is effectively coextensive with proof of guilt, as the direction is unnecessary and risks inviting circular reasoning. However, where such a direction is erroneously given, the proviso may be applied if the evidence is overwhelming and there is no realistic risk the jury engaged in improper reasoning.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 6 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.