Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Yesilhat v Calokerinos [2015] NSWSC 1028 — Security For Costs — Barrister AI

Yesilhat v Calokerinos

[2015] NSWSC 1028

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › security for costs
3. › inherent jurisdiction
4. › application for security for costs against natural person
5. › application based on a failure to comply with the Court’s directions
6. › no evidence of impecuniosity or other relevant factors
7. › application dismissed with costs

Case Details

Citation[2015] NSWSC 1028

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 7 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 7 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by7

2021Yesilhat v CalokerinosNSWCA 110
2020Bailey v PalomboNSWSC 1209
2020Indjic v StojanovicNSWSC 470
2019Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos v Yesilhat; Yesilhat v Calokerinos, Executor of the Estate of the late George Sclavos (No. 2)NSWSC 584
and 3 more after sign-in

Relies on20

2015Snow v SnowNSWSC 90
2013NSW Trustee and Guardian v McGrath & OrsNSWSC 1894
2013O'Brien v Bank of Western Australia LtdNSWCA 71
2010Spencer v Commonwealth of AustraliaHCA 28
and 16 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works