DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis

[2015] NSWSC 1567

Supreme Court of NSW

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › interlocutory injunctions
3. › application to compel defendant to prevent access to internet blog posts, and to restrain defendant from publishing injurious falsehoods
4. › consideration of undesirability of framing injunctions in terms of the elements of the tort
1. Torts
2. › injurious falsehood
3. › elements of the tort
4. › relevance of the principle of free speech to interlocutory injunction to restrain injurious falsehoods
5. › held, refusing the application, that insufficient evidence was adduced to establish a serious question to be tried as to the falsity of the statements
1. Trade Practices
2. › misleading or deceptive conduct
3. › application for interlocutory injunction
4. › held, refusing the application, that insufficient evidence was adduced to establish a serious question to be tried as to the representations being misleading or deceptive, or as to their being made in trade or commerce