Nitschke v Medical Board of Australia (No2)

[2015] NTSC 50

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Costs
2. › appeal from Health Professional Review Tribunal
3. › appellant successful on main grounds of appeal
4. › appellant did not succeed on some grounds
5. › notice of appeal amended prior to hearing
6. › no reason to depart from usual order as to costs
7. › appellant also to have normal costs of appeal to the Tribunal
8. › Supreme Court Rules (NT) r 63.03.
1. Supreme Court Rules (NT) rr 63.03; 63.09.
1. Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCAFC 119, distinguished.
1. Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72; Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCR 229; State of Victoria v Sportsbet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 174, referred to.