Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Wilson v Berlin [2015] NTSC 52 — Justices Act S 176A & Sentencing — Barrister AI

Wilson v Berlin

[2015] NTSC 52

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeals
2. › Justices Act s 176A
3. › Fresh evidence
4. › Grounds for receiving fresh evidence
5. › Whether reasonable explanation as to why the evidence was not adduced in the lower court proceedings
6. › Whether evidence is likely to be credible
7. › Evidence ‘likely to be credible’ must be capable of belief
8. › Whether evidence would not afford a ground for allowing the appeal
9. › Evidence capable of affecting the assessment of the appeal
10. › Evidence admitted
1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Mandatory sentencing
4. › Exceptional circumstances
5. › Circumstances not exceptional when taken individually
6. › Cumulative effect of circumstances exceptional
7. › Mandatory minimum period excluded
8. › Appeal allowed
9. › Resentence
1. Criminal Code s 43C
1. Justices Act s 176A

Case Details

Citation[2015] NTSC 52

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2018Patrick v RigbyNTSC 67
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works