A litigant who seeks a referral of a question of law to resist disciplinary proceedings brought against them personally is acting in their own interests, not advancing the public interest, and cannot rely on the public interest exception to the general rule that costs follow the event. The fact that the opposing party did not oppose the referral and had its own interest in the issue being resolved does not change this characterisation.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.