Pott v Clayton Utz [2015] QDC 66 — Application & Costs Assessment — Barrister AI
← Back
Pott v Clayton Utz
[2015] QDC 66
District Court of Queensland
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on Official Website
More
View on Official Website
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+5 more
Application
Costs assessment
where a preliminary determination of issues in dispute is required prior to costs assessment
issues as to credit
Case Details
Citation
[2015] QDC 66
Court
QDC
Jurisdiction
Queensland
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
