The prosecution's decision to charge persistent sexual exploitation under s 50 CLCA rather than specific offences is a matter of prosecutorial discretion not reviewable by the court. Where a s 50 charge includes particulars of varying seriousness, special verdicts are generally unnecessary because the sentencing judge determines the factual basis for sentence, finding facts proved beyond reasonable doubt so long as they are not inconsistent with the jury's verdict. The conviction is not void for uncertainty merely because the jury returned a general verdict on a charge with particulars ranging from less serious to more serious conduct.
The full text is available to signed-in members.