Evidence of a plaintiff's prior criminal charge and acquittal may be admissible where it is relevant to psychiatric causation, even though prejudicial, provided the trial judge balances probative value against prejudice and puts appropriate protections in place. A party's forensic choice not to seek discharge of the jury after an adverse evidentiary ruling tells against that party on appeal when arguing the evidence was so prejudicial that no direction could ensure a fair trial.
The full text is available to signed-in members.