T v S

• 1. Family Law
  2. › Parenting orders
  3. › Best interests of child
  4. › Paramountcy principle
  5. › Balancing exercise
  6. › Whether trial judge gave insufficient weight to unenforceability of orders in foreign jurisdiction
  7. › Family Court Act 1997 (WA), ss 66A, 66C, 89(1)
• 1. Family Law
  2. › Parenting orders
  3. › Relevant and irrelevant considerations
  4. › Whether likelihood of voluntary compliance with orders is a prohibited consideration
  5. › Family Court Act 1997 (WA), ss 66A, 66C, 89(1)
• 1. Family Law
  2. › Parenting orders
  3. › Child's views
  4. › Whether court required to take further steps to ascertain child's views where child refused to participate
  5. › Whether evidentiary basis for finding child too young to express meaningful view
  6. › Family Court Act 1997 (WA), ss 66C(3)(a), 66D, 66E
• 1. Family Law
  2. › Parenting orders
  3. › Family violence
  4. › Whether failure to refer to limited evidence of single incident of alleged violence constituted material error
  5. › Family Court Act 1997 (WA), ss 66C(2)(b), 66G(1)(b)

Quick Take