Beard v WA

[2015] WASCA 74

Western Australia Court of Appeal

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Sentencing
3. › Manslaughter
4. › Motor vehicle manslaughter
5. › Whether offence in worst category of its type
6. › Whether characterisation referred to manslaughter generally or motor vehicle manslaughter specifically
7. › Criminal Code (WA), s 280
1. Criminal Law
2. › Appeal against sentence
3. › Manifest excess
4. › Whether sentence unreasonable or unjust
5. › Relevance of increased maximum penalty
6. › Relevance of comparable sentences
7. › Criminal Appeals Act 2004 (WA), s 41

Quick Take

A sentencing judge's characterisation of an offence as being in 'the worst category' must be read in context; where the judge was agreeing with a prosecution submission about motor vehicle manslaughter specifically, the characterisation does not engage the principles applicable to worst category cases of manslaughter generally. Sentences for motor vehicle manslaughter must reflect the 2012 increase in maximum penalty from 20 years to life imprisonment, and pre-2012 comparable sentences must be viewed in that light.