A primary judge assessing damages for future economic loss is not required to adopt an arithmetical approach; a buffer is permissible where the uncertainties surrounding the plaintiff's future earning capacity are too great to permit a mathematical calculation, provided the reasoning is transparent and based on the evidence. The statement of Stephen J in Gamser v Nominal Defendant does not mandate a mathematical approach but requires a transparent and reasoned approach to the assessment.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 9 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 9 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.