R v Cx

[2016] ACTSC 106

Supreme Court of the ACT20 May 2016

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Particular Offences
3. › offences against the person
4. › engaging in sexual intercourse with a young person
5. › act of indecency with a young person
6. › indecent assault.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › application to admit tendency evidence
4. › where accused applies to cross-examine complainants on application
5. › whether allegations concocted
6. › whether allegations subject to contamination
7. › consideration of IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14
8. › application allowed in part.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › application to admit relationship and or context evidence
4. › to explain late complaint
5. › application allowed in part.

Citation[2016] ACTSC 106

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date20 May 2016

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 8 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in