Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Le v Sx [2016] ACTSC 107 — Costs & Parties: — Barrister AI

Le v Sx

[2016] ACTSC 107

Supreme Court of the ACT30 May 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Procedure
2. › Costs
3. › application to set aside costs order
4. › whether application should proceed before different judicial officer
5. › where judge who made costs order in best position to determine application
6. › application to be relisted.
1. Parties:
1. LE (Applicant)
1. SX (Respondent)

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 107

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date30 May 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2016Le v Sx (No 3)ACTSC 243

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works