Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Peden v Boxx (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 110 — Procedure & Costs — Barrister AI

Peden v Boxx (No 2)

[2016] ACTSC 110

Supreme Court of the ACT6 June 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Procedure
1. Costs
1. costs order made in appellate proceedings from Magistrates Court
1. order that unsuccessful party pay costs of the appeal

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 110

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date6 June 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2017Boxx v PedenACTCA 39
2016Klootwijk v HipwellACTSC 182

Relies on4

2016Peden v BoxxACTSC 86
2004Byrnes v BarryACTCA 24
1999Walsh v NSW Law SocietyHCA 33
1998Fleming v RHCA 68

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works