Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v McGrail [2016] ACTSC 142 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v McGrail

[2016] ACTSC 142

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › Jurisdiction, practice and procedure
3. › Bail
4. › insufficient evidence
5. › adjournment to seek further evidence
6. › mere assertion insufficient
7. › drug and alcohol abuse
8. › applicant seeking rehabilitation
9. › history of breaching bail
10. › reoffending
11. › consumption of alcohol
12. › failure to report

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 142

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 14 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by14

2023R v Subasic (No 2)ACTSC 79
2022R v WintersACTSC 371
2017R v JohnACTSC 144
2017R v Eyles (No 3)ACTSC 1
and 10 more after sign-in

Relies on25

2015R v PikulaACTSC 380
2015Bedford v EarleACTSC 306
2015R v OgilvieACTSC 296
2015R v HoangACTSC 195
and 21 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works