Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Hoang [2016] ACTSC 183 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Hoang

[2016] ACTSC 183

Supreme Court of the ACT22 July 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and Punishment
4. › Sentence
5. › drug offences
6. › trafficking in controlled substance other than cannabis, namely heroin
7. › s 603(7) Criminal Code 2002 (ACT)
8. › sentence of full-time imprisonment imposed
9. › partially suspended
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and Punishment
4. › Sentence
5. › resisting a Territory official
6. › s 361 Criminal Code 2002 (ACT)

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 183

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date22 July 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2021R v VuACTSC 347
2020R v HoangACTSC 262
2019R v BmACTSC 281

Relies on4

2015R v Huat PhayACTSC 238
2015R v HoangACTSC 138
2011Muldrock v The QueenHCA 39
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works