R v Cruz

[2016] ACTSC 19

Supreme Court of the ACT15 February 2016

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Particular Offences
3. › offences against the person
4. › engaging in sexual intercourse with a person under 10 years
5. › indecency on person under 10 years.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › complainant unavailable witness under s 4(g) of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
4. › whether prior representations admissible
5. › hearsay
6. › s 65(2)(b) of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
7. › unlikely representation is a fabrication
8. › relevant circumstances
9. › DNA evidence
10. › representation admissible.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › complainant unavailable witness under s 4(g) of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
4. › whether prior representation admissible
5. › hearsay
6. › s 65(2)(c) of the Evidence Act 2011 (ACT)
7. › whether highly probable representation is reliable
8. › representation excluded.

Citation[2016] ACTSC 19

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date15 February 2016

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in