Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Lutz v JK [2016] ACTSC 200 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

Lutz v JK

[2016] ACTSC 200

Supreme Court of the ACT18 July 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Punishment
4. › young offender
5. › s 17(2) Crimes (Sentencing) Act 2005 (ACT)
6. › non-conviction order an exceptional outcome
7. › negligent driving causing death
8. › whether sentence manifestly inadequate
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Procedural fairness
4. › sentencing
5. › parties not afforded opportunity to address on penalty
6. › where outcome not contemplated by parties

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 200

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date18 July 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by6

2024Hua v QiaoACTSC 121
2023DPP v BarrettACTSC 260
2022Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v PeckhamNSWSC 713
2021Bennett v DaleyACTSC 159
and 2 more after sign-in

Relies on14

2016Nguyen v The QueenHCA 17
2014R v Duffy & OrsACTCA 53
2014Walters v CooperACTSC 331
2014R v HutchinsonACTCA 29
and 10 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works