Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Bl [2016] ACTSC 209 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Bl

[2016] ACTSC 209

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Evidence
4. › recorded evidence
5. › police interview
6. › editing
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Evidence
4. › special arrangements for witness
5. › witness with disability
6. › sensitivity to glare
7. › wear cap or visor
8. › fair trial
9. › importance of seeing witness’ eyes
10. › clear sight of face necessary

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 209

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2017R v Al-Harazi (No 6)ACTSC 63
2017R v BlACTSC 16

Relies on8

2015Mulligan v Virgin Australia Airlines Pty LtdFCAFC 130
2010Paul Edward Elson v Gregory Paul Ayton, Adam Mathew Saliba and Melanie Thea Slavin-MollyACTSC 70
2009R v GormanACTSC 7
1923R v MacFarlaneHCA 39
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works