R v Qi

[2016] ACTSC 21

Supreme Court of the ACT17 February 2016

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Criminal Law
2. › Particular offences
3. › indecency in the presence of a young person under the age of 16 years
4. › engaging in sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 16 years.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › application to admit relationship and or context evidence
4. › where acts are not obviously sexual in nature
5. › evidence of sexualised conversations initiated by accused
6. › evidence the accused would confide in the complainant
7. › evidence to show nature of the relationship
8. › to contextualise delay in reporting
9. › application allowed in part.
1. Evidence
2. › Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
3. › application to admit tendency evidence
4. › to have a sexual attraction to the complainant
5. › to engage in sexualised conversation with the complainant
6. › to engage in sexual conduct with the complainant
7. › to normalise sexual interaction through the use of pornography
8. › application allowed in part.

Citation[2016] ACTSC 21

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date17 February 2016

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in