Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Al-Harazi (No 3) [2016] ACTSC 290 — Procedure & Criminal Law — Barrister AI

R v Al-Harazi (No 3)

[2016] ACTSC 290

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Procedure
1. Criminal Law
1. Vacation of trial
1. fitness to plead

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 290

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2018Al-Harazi v The QueenACTCA 40
2017R v Al-Harazi (No 7)ACTSC 350
2017R v Al-Harazi (No 5)ACTSC 61
2016R v Al-Harazi (No 4)ACTSC 298

Relies on4

2016R v Al-Harazi (No 2)ACTSC 273
2009R v GoodwinACTSC 111
2001Regina v T J TierNSWCCA 53
2000Eastman v RHCA 29

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works