Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Sampson v De Haan [2016] ACTSC 327 — Criminal Law & Totality — Barrister AI

Sampson v De Haan

[2016] ACTSC 327

Supreme Court of the ACT22 November 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal
2. › CRIMINAL LAW
3. › Appeal from the Magistrates Court
4. › appeal against sentence
5. › error in sentencing process
6. › manifestly excessive
7. › non parole period incorrectly set
1. pre-sentence custody not taken into account
2. › totality
3. › appeal upheld

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 327

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date22 November 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 16 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 16 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by16

2025DPP v Swain (a pseudonym) (No 2)ACTSC 209
2025DPP v Kaye (a pseudonym)ACTSC 169
2024McCurley v StirlingACTSC 41
2023DPP v DB (A Pseudonym)ACTSC 294
and 12 more after sign-in

Relies on48

2016Miles v The QueenACTCA 54
2016Law v IlievskiACTSC 291
2016R v Massey (No 2)ACTSC 278
2016Greatorex v The QueenVSCA 136
and 44 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works