Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Bi (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 355 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Bi (No 2)

[2016] ACTSC 355

Supreme Court of the ACT9 December 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Trial by jury
4. › historical sexual offences
5. › multiple offences
6. › multiple complainants
7. › multiple charges
8. › act of indecency against a person aged 16 years or below
9. › sexual intercourse with a person aged 16 years or below
10. › incest

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 355

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date9 December 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by6

2023DPP v Kerry (a pseudonym) (No 7)ACTSC 65
2023Marshall v The KingACTCA 11
2022Director of Public Prosecutions v Kader (No 4)ACTSC 287
2019O'Reilly v EdgarQSC 24
and 2 more after sign-in

Relies on18

2016R v Connors (No 2)ACTSC 333
2016IMM v The QueenHCA 14
2015Gall v R; Gall v RNSWCCA 69
2014Mark Anthony Munro v The QueenACTCA 11
and 14 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works