Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Ca [2016] ACTSC 378 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure & Sentence — Barrister AI

R v Ca

[2016] ACTSC 378

Supreme Court of the ACT19 October 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. Judgment and Punishment
2. › Sentence
3. › aggravated burglary
1. theft
2. › breach of good behaviour order
3. › prior similar offences
1. pleas of guilty
2. › rehabilitation

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 378

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date19 October 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by5

2025DPP v Brooks (a pseudonym)ACTSC 45
2024DPP v Bower (No 3)ACTSC 249
2022R v Cajina (No 2)ACTSC 383
2021R v Kelly (No 2)ACTSC 253
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on1

2014R v CaACTSC 332

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works