Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Vosikata (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 391 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Vosikata (No 2)

[2016] ACTSC 391

Supreme Court of the ACT16 December 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and Punishment
4. › Sentence
5. › offences against the person
6. › murder
7. › plea of guilty
8. › disputed facts
9. › intention
10. › sentenced to terms of imprisonment.

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 391

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date16 December 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by3

2025DPP v WijesingheACTSC 543
2019Secretary & Ors v Northern Territory of AustraliaNTSC 73
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on8

2016The Queen v KilicHCA 48
2016Vojneski v The QueenACTCA 57
2013R v SchmidtACTSC 295
2009Burrell v ReginaNSWCCA 163
and 4 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works