Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Keir (No 2) [2016] ACTSC 394 — Evidence — Barrister AI

R v Keir (No 2)

[2016] ACTSC 394

Supreme Court of the ACT13 April 2016

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
1. Judicial Discretion to Admit or Exclude Evidence
1. previous representation made by an unavailable person to give evidence
1. Need for Crown to put its case in examination-in-chief

Case Details

Citation[2016] ACTSC 394

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date13 April 2016

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2022Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v Namoi Valley Farms Pty Ltd (No 3)NSWLEC 54
2020R v Al Batat & Ors (No 5)NSWSC 1077

Relies on3

2005R v FletcherNSWCCA 338
2003Regina v ParkesNSWCCA 12
2003R v SomaHCA 13

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works