› need to generalise the tendency exemplified by the evidence sought to be admitted
› tendency described as relating to two named complainants could not justify admission of evidence relating to one complainant in relation to charges involving the other complainant
› tendency reformulated.
Evidence
› Admissibility and Relevancy
› tendency evidence
› need to generalise the tendency exemplified by the evidence sought to be admitted
› tendency described as relating to two named complainants could not justify admission of evidence relating to one complainant in relation to charges involving the other complainant
› tendency reformulated.
Case Details
Citation[2016] ACTSC 5
CourtACTSC
JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
Decision Date15 December 2015
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.
