TJ (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v WA (No 4) [2016] FCA 231 — Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
TJ (on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People) v WA (No 4)
[2016] FCA 231
Federal Court of Australia
9 March 2016
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - whether subpoena oppressive
›
whether narrowed subpoena oppressive
›
number of documents required to be produced pursuant to subpoena
›
amount of time for compliance with subpoena
›
age and location of documents required to be produced pursuant to subpoena
Practice and Procedure
›
non-party access to documents produced pursuant to subpoena
›
whether advantageous to non-party
›
primary objective to ensure efficient resolution of dispute
Practice and Procedure
›
legal professional privilege
›
application of principles
›
dominant purpose test
›
communication between solicitors and proposed expert witness
Case Details
Citation
[2016] FCA 231
Court
FCA
Jurisdiction
Commonwealth
Decision Date
9 March 2016
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] FCA 231
16 authorities it relies on
1979
1986
1993
2000
2007
2016
Relies on
16
2012
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (No 3)
FCA 61
2010
Goldie v Gordon Theodore Hothershall Getley as Executor of the Estate of Janet May Goldie [No 2]
WASC 66
2003
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Ltd
FCA 804
2003
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Lux Pty Ltd
FCA 89
and 12 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
