The Court of Appeal refused to reopen its earlier judgment dismissing a prisoner's appeal concerning denial of permission to purchase a 24-inch monitor. The Court held that it had not misapprehended the facts regarding other prisoners' access to larger monitors, that discrimination is not a ground of judicial review, and that the applicant's challenge to the finding of no bad faith amounted to mere disagreement with the conclusion reached on the evidence. No costs were ordered against the applicant because the respondent was not required to file a response and incurred no recoverable costs.
The full text is available to signed-in members.