Where a primary judge makes orders without giving reasons and the absence of reasons is not relied upon as a ground of appeal, it is not possible for an appeal to proceed on the proposed grounds because error cannot be identified. An application for leave to appeal will also be refused where the relief sought has no continuing utility because the respondent is already providing what the applicant seeks to have ordered.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.