The Court held that cumulative procedural unfairness from excessive judicial intervention may not be subject to waiver where the unfairness cannot be identified at a specific point in time, and that a positive finding of dishonesty requires more than mere preference for a conflicting version of events.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 192 later cases that cite this judgment.
17 of the 192 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.