The 'in most cases' observation from M v The Queen (that a doubt experienced by the appellate court will be one the jury should also have experienced) should not be elevated to a discrete proposition of law; doing so inverts its import and reverts to the debate the High Court sought to quell. A complainant's admitted lies to police do not necessarily render a verdict unreasonable where the core account is corroborated by objective evidence and coherent detail.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 10 later cases that cite this judgment.
4 of the 10 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.