R v Barakat; R v Younes (No 2)

[2016] NSWSC 1255

Supreme Court of NSW

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › accessory after the fact to murder
3. › application under s 138 of the Evidence Act 1900 (NSW) to exclude evidence said to be obtained improperly
4. › where request made to owner of vehicle under s 14(1)(c) of LEPRA to disclose driver of vehicle
5. › whether s 14(1)(c) permitted questions asked
6. › whether accused ought to have been cautioned
7. › evidence not obtained improperly
8. › application refused
1. Evidence
2. › application to exclude an admission under s 90 of the Evidence Act 1900 (NSW)
3. › whether it would be unfair to accused to use the evidence having regard to the circumstances in which the admission was made
4. › no unfairness
5. › application dismissed
1. Words and Phrases
2. › “require”

Citation[2016] NSWSC 1255

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Already have an account? Sign in