R v Barakat; R v Younes (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 1310 — Shooting Murder & Telephone Intercept — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Barakat; R v Younes (No 4)
[2016] NSWSC 1310
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Evidence
›
shooting murder
›
where accused in a possession of a bulletproof vest at the time of execution of a search warrant
›
whether evidence relevant
›
whether probative value outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice - danger that jury would engage in impermissible tendency reasoning
›
- evidence excluded under s 137
Evidence
›
telephone intercept
›
where accused makes reference to a firearm in casual conversation
›
where Crown contends that evidence demonstrates that the accused is a person familiar with firearms
›
evidence irrelevant and therefore inadmissible
Case Details
Citation
[2016] NSWSC 1310
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] NSWSC 1310
2 authorities it relies on
1999
2002
2005
2008
2011
2014
2016
Relies on
2
2016
R v Barakat; R v Younes (No 1)
NSWSC 1152
1999
Papakosmas v R
HCA 37
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works