Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Re Filomena Rodi, deceased [2016] NSWSC 1696 — Family Provision — Barrister AI

Re Filomena Rodi, deceased

[2016] NSWSC 1696

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Succession
2. › Family Provision
3. › Eligible applicant
4. › Adult Grandchild
5. › Dependent or other person
6. › Grandchild lived with deceased in a close personal relationship at the time of death
7. › Family arrangement where grandchild lived with deceased for about a decade
8. › Grandchild currently single parent caring for infant daughter and is unemployed
9. › Grandchild eligible person and left without adequate provision
1. Succession
2. › Family Provision
3. › Eligible applicant
4. › Adult Child
5. › Deceased left will with four children given equal shares
6. › Applicant estranged from siblings
7. › - Adequate provision made in Will
8. › Application dismissed

Case Details

Citation[2016] NSWSC 1696

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by5

2024Le v Angius; Angius v AngiusNSWSC 924
2024Frank v AngellNSWSC 158
2019Pulitano v PulitanoNSWSC 1688
2017Saravinovski v SaravinovskaNSWCA 85
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on7

2016Page v PageNSWSC 1218
2015Bruce v GreentreeNSWSC 1611
2015Ciric v CiricNSWSC 313
2012Andrew v AndrewNSWCA 308
and 3 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works