Clark v Ro [2016] NSWSC 1877 — Succession & The First Defendant, The — Barrister AI
← Back
Clark v Ro
[2016] NSWSC 1877
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+7 more
Succession
›
FAMILY PROVISION - Claim for family provision order
under Part 3.2 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
›
The first Defendant, the
widow and sole beneficiary
›
The second Defendant the executor of the Will
of the deceased
Case Details
Citation
[2016] NSWSC 1877
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] NSWSC 1877
70 authorities it relies on
1938
1954
1970
1986
2002
2016
Relies on
70
2016
Chan v Chan
NSWCA 222
2016
Hinderry v Hinderry
NSWSC 780
2016
Morier v Liem
NSWSC 582
2016
Henry v Hancock
NSWSC 71
and 66 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works