Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Sigalla [2016] NSWSC 465 — Procedure & Insufficient Funds To — Barrister AI

R v Sigalla

[2016] NSWSC 465

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › procedure
3. › application to vacate trial date
1. accused unrepresented
2. › insufficient funds to
1. secure services of
1. counsel
2. › trial date previously vacated - duty and obligations of a trial

Case Details

Citation[2016] NSWSC 465

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2016R v Sigalla (No 2)NSWSC 940
2016R v SigallaNSWSC 585

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works