Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Furlong v Wise & Young Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 647 — Costs & Should Pay — Barrister AI

Furlong v Wise & Young Pty Ltd

[2016] NSWSC 647

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Costs
2. › allegations of dishonesty and serious misconduct made in
1. proposed cross-claim without proper basis
2. › whether solicitor
1. should pay

Case Details

Citation[2016] NSWSC 647

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2019In the matter of GHS Safety Products Pty LtdNSWSC 668
2016Kathleen Jeanne Furlong & Mark Andrew Leishman (a bankrupt) v Wise & Young Pty Ltd, Defined Properties Investment Pty Ltd & Wyse and Young International Pty Ltd; Wise & Young Pty Ltd, Defined Properties Investment Pty Ltd & Wyse and Young International Pty Ltd v Kathleen Jeanne Furlong, Gilbert Innes Leishman, Design by Kaka Pty Ltd as trustee for Kathleen Leishman Investment Trust, GIM Investments (ncle) Pty Ltd as trustee for Kathleen Leishman Investment Trust & Kim Magella Leishman; Gilbert Innes Leishman v Defined Properties Investment Pty Ltd, Wise & Young Pty Ltd, Wise & Young International Pty Ltd, George Dimitriou and Bramco Group International Pty LtdNSWSC 1839

Relies on4

2015Re Felicity; FM v Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services (No 4)NSWCA 19
2007Karwala v Skrzypczak Re Estate of RatajczakNSWSC 931
2006In the matter of Bauhaus Pyrmont Pty Ltd (in liq)NSWSC 879
1992Knight v FP Special Assets LtdHCA 28

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works