R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 53) [2016] NSWSC 653 — Evidence & Assessment Of The Crown Case As A Whole — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Rogerson; R v McNamara (No 53)
[2016] NSWSC 653
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
View on CaseLaw
More
View on CaseLaw
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+2 more
Criminal Law
›
Evidence
›
Where the Crown sought a direction as
to use of lies as evidence of consciousness of guilt
determination of whether statements were lies generally depended upon an
assessment of the Crown case as a whole
Case Details
Citation
[2016] NSWSC 653
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2016] NSWSC 653
3 authorities it relies on
1993
1998
2003
2008
2013
2016
Relies on
3
2011
R v Lane
NSWCCA 157
2006
Regina v Lodhi
NSWSC 672
1993
Edwards v R
HCA 63
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
