Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Steiner v Strang [2016] NSWSC 9 — Account Stated & Conventional Estoppel — Barrister AI

Steiner v Strang

[2016] NSWSC 9

Supreme Court of NSW

View on CaseLaw

More

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Money Counts
2. › Account Stated
3. › Nature of cause of action
4. › debt
5. › Pleading requirements
1. Estoppel
2. › Conventional estoppel
3. › Elements
4. › Detrimental reliance
1. Practice
2. › Applications for Summary Relief
3. › Defective pleading struck out with leave to replead
4. › Summary disposal not appropriate
5. › Reasonably arguable case available

Case Details

Citation[2016] NSWSC 9

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 13 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by13

2025Gorilla Rush Pty Ltd v FraserNSWCA 191
2021Yalda v MshrefNSWSC 624
2020Coleman v Australasian Fencing Pty LtdNSWSC 1090
2020Nanevski Developments Pty Ltd v SlaveskiNSWSC 617
and 9 more after sign-in

Relies on19

2015Steiner v StrangNSWCA 203
2014John Steiner v Kenneth Ross Strang and Jason TangNSWSC 1250
2014Champion Homes Sales Pty Ltd v JKAM Investments Pty LtdHotray Pty Ltd v JKAM Investments Pty LtdNSWSC 952
2013Labracon Pty Limited v Cuturich & AnorNSWSC 97
and 15 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works