Maria Saravinovksa v Krste (Chris) Saravinovski; Chris Saravinovski v George Saravinovski (No 6)

[2016] NSWSC 964

Supreme Court of NSW

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Estoppel
2. › Whether representations made
3. › No issue of principle
1. Evidence
2. › Affidavit evidence
3. › Further application to use parts of affidavits excluded due to deponent’s lack of mental capacity
4. › Evidence said to be corroborated by other evidence already admitted
5. › UCPR Pt 35, r 35.2(3)
1. Evidence
2. › General matters
3. › Inferences
4. › Jones v Dunkel inference drawn for failure to call solicitor in relation to matters where client legal privilege had been waived
1. Evidence
2. › Inspection
3. › Late application to have access to videotape for expert to examine authenticity
4. › Evidence Act 1995, s 169
5. › UCPR Pt 23r 23.8