Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Karui [2016] NTSC 13 — Evidence — Barrister AI

R v Karui

[2016] NTSC 13

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Police Administration Act 1978 s 142
4. › accused asked police officer a question indicating accused’s knowledge of offence
5. › implied admission
6. › admission after formal questioning
7. › not electronically recorded
8. › evidence inadmissible
9. › not within statutory exceptions
10. › alternative characterization as admission made during questioning
11. › evidence inadmissible because admission not electronically recorded.
1. Criminal Law
2. › EVIDENCE
3. › Voir Dire
4. › admissibility
5. › accused asked police officer a question indicating accused’s knowledge of offence
6. › implied admission
7. › affirmative link in chain of evidence
8. › capable of being regarded as an admission for the purpose of deciding admissibility.

Case Details

Citation[2016] NTSC 13

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by3

2020The Queen v JenningsNTSC 71
2019The Queen v TipilouraNTSC 92
2017The Queen v Adam FilipponeNTSC 67

Relies on10

2007Em v The QueenHCA 46
2000Queen v GH (Includes Corrigenda dated 14 November 2000)FCA 1618
1999R v JGWNSWCCA 116
1998R v SwaffieldHCA 1
and 6 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works