Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Gaykamangu v NTA [2016] NTSC 26 — Alcohol Protection Orders Act, Ss 5, 23. — Barrister AI

Gaykamangu v NTA

[2016] NTSC 26

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Application for leave to join police officers to enable a claim in the nature of punitive damages
2. › Meaning of “punitive damages” - Discretion to grant leave is at large
3. › Onus
4. › Requirement to demonstrate an evidentiary basis for an award of punitive damages
5. › Assessment of evidence to determine the existence of an evidentiary basis.
1. Police Administration Act, ss 127A, 128, 148B, 148C and 148F;
1. Alcohol Protection Orders Act, ss 5, 23.
1. Liquor Act, s 101U.

Case Details

Citation[2016] NTSC 26

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 3 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by3

2023Sherrington v ICAC & OrsNTCA 11
2019Secretary & Ors v Northern Territory of AustraliaNTSC 73
2018Phillip Pearce O'Shea v Northern Territory of AustraliaNTSC 73

Relies on9

2016Mole v PriorNTCA 2
2012Majindi v Northern Territory & OrsNTSC 25
1987Lamb v CotognoHCA 47
1966Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty LtdHCA 40
and 5 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works